<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/" xmlns:sioc="http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#" xmlns:sioct="http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/saas">
  <channel>
    <title>SaaS</title>
    <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/saas</link>
    <description/>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
  <title>Effects of Cloud Computing on Open-Source Compliance</title>
  <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/effects-cloud-computing-open-source-compliance</link>
  <description>  &lt;div data-history-node-id="1089354" class="layout layout--onecol"&gt;
    &lt;div class="layout__region layout__region--content"&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-field-node-image field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;img src="https://www.linuxjournal.com/sites/default/files/nodeimage/story/cloud-keyboard.jpg" width="500" height="334" alt="" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-author field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;by &lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/diana-cooper" lang="" about="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/diana-cooper" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="" xml:lang=""&gt;Diana Cooper&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/ufiles/imagecache/small-200px-left-align-wrap/u1002061/cloud-keyboard.jpg" alt="" title="" class="imagecache-small-200px-left-align-wrap" /&gt;&lt;p&gt;
Since the emergence of strong cloud service providers like Amazon Web Services,
Google and Rackspace, software development and deployment is increasingly taking
place in the cloud. According to Gartner, cloud computing is expected to grow
at a rate of 19% this year. Big industry players including Netflix and eBay
already have turned to the cloud for significant proportions of their operations
and offerings. And in the next few years, we are likely to see more and more
innovative startups like Coupa completely suspended in the cloud, relegating
on-premise computing to a vestige of a bygone era.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
While enterprises are shifting from legacy solutions toward the cloud, open-source software is gaining significant traction for similar reasons. Gartner
projects that 99% of Global 2000 companies will incorporate open source into
their operations by 2016. Adopters of both cloud and open-source solutions are
drawn toward the increased potential for collaboration and lower total cost of
ownership.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
The proliferation of open-source cloud projects (think OpenStack, CloudStack,
Eucalyptus) and increasing use of open-source software within the cloud
suggests a need for enterprises to understand how the cloud environment impacts
open-source license compliance. Before the emergence of the cloud, restrictive
open-source licenses maintained software freedom through the regulation of
distribution. However, because software is provided as a service in the cloud,
licensing obligations that are linked to the act of distribution no longer
apply. This has led to the development of newer cloud-driven restrictive open-source
licenses, such as the AGPL. The game-changing effect of the cloud on
traditional open-source compliance mechanisms and the subsequent development of
remedial open-source licenses calls for organizations to audit and update their
intellectual property policies to minimize the risk of infringement.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h3&gt;
The Traditional Proprietary vs. Open-Source Battle and the Rise of Permissive and
Restrictive Licenses&lt;/h3&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
The emergence of cloud computing and its impact on open-source compliance has
reignited the historical battle between proprietary and open-source software,
and reinforced traditional divisions within the Open Source community. The
genesis of the proprietary vs. open-source debate dates back to the unbundling of
IBM in the mid-1970s, after which it was no longer possible for users to access
and modify code. Although user freedoms were removed through the process of
unbundling, programmers continued to find ways to access, modify and share code,
famously prompting Bill Gates to write his "Open Letter to
Hobbyists" after
Microsoft's Basic was leaked. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-link field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;a href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/effects-cloud-computing-open-source-compliance" hreflang="und"&gt;Go to Full Article&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      
    &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;

</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 21:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Diana Cooper</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">1089354 at https://www.linuxjournal.com</guid>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
