<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="https://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:foaf="https://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:og="https://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:rdfs="https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="https://schema.org/" xmlns:sioc="https://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#" xmlns:sioct="https://rdfs.org/sioc/types#" xmlns:skos="https://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:xsd="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/tiling">
  <channel>
    <title>tiling</title>
    <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/tiling</link>
    <description/>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
  <title>Talking Point: Overlapping Windows</title>
  <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/talking-point-overlapping-windows</link>
  <description>  &lt;div data-history-node-id="1020275" class="layout layout--onecol"&gt;
    &lt;div class="layout__region layout__region--content"&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-field-node-image field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;img src="https://www.linuxjournal.com/sites/default/files/nodeimage/story/overlapping_windows_scaled.png" width="200" height="160" alt="" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-author field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;by &lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/michael-reed" lang="" about="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/michael-reed" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="" xml:lang=""&gt;Michael Reed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Back in the 80s, a GUI paradigm called WIMP (Windows, Icons, Mouse, Pointer) began to establish itself as the new way in which most people interacted with computers. When it comes to one of the most significant elements of that system, overlapping windows, I'm beginning to wonder, has it had its day?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of few things that Microsoft can claim to have developed from scratch is an efficient method of application switching called the &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taskbar"&gt;taskbar&lt;/a&gt;, although it's now in the process of being superseded on most GUIs by the &lt;a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dock_%28computing%29"&gt;application dock&lt;/a&gt;. One side-effect of that form of program management is that it doesn't penalize the user for running applications fullscreen, and it therefore encourages it. You can glean some ideas about modern user behavior by observing that,  in the most popular WM themes and skins, the areas of the window that are  used for resizing have almost disappeared.  The truth is, if you use Gnome or KDE, you probably run most of your apps fullscreen, most of the time. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the future, I think that overlapping windows will be seen as a power user's feature, rather like the command line. The non-expert computer user has little use for windows that don't encompass the entire screen, and novice users find resizable, overlapping windows confusing. There are some operations, such as dragging and dropping of file icons, that benefit from overlapping windows, but again, this is a feature that is mostly used by experts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PDAs and other small computers have long pioneered the techniques needed to make multiple running programs individually accessible. Running everything fullscreen on a full-sized device does, however, present a few drawbacks. For one thing, text can be difficult to read when spread out over large areas on modern widescreen monitors. Personally, I wouldn't fancy word processing on a 24” widescreen monitor with the main window maximized. I think that multi-column websites give us some clues as to what a desktop of the future might look like.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are probably two solutions that we are going to see dominate over the next few years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly, tiled window management, of a sort that has existed for many years on Linux, may finally break through to the mainstream. Tiling has the advantage that it does away with the complexities and inefficiencies of overlapping windows while still allowing the user to view more than one window at once. It's worth noting that KDE SC 4.5 &lt;a href="https://linuxology.wordpress.com/2010/06/12/promoting-kde-kwin-tiling-in-kde-sc-4-5/"&gt;introduced&lt;/a&gt; tiling support.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="https://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/ufiles/u1013687/overlapping_windows_wmii.png" alt="" height="281" width="550" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The wmii window manager. Could this be a glimpse into the future?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-link field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;a href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/talking-point-overlapping-windows" hreflang="und"&gt;Go to Full Article&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      
    &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;

</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael Reed</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">1020275 at https://www.linuxjournal.com</guid>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
