<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/" xmlns:sioc="http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#" xmlns:sioct="http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/national-linux">
  <channel>
    <title>national linux</title>
    <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/national-linux</link>
    <description/>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
  <title>Russian Linux: The Push Continues</title>
  <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/russian-linux-push-continues</link>
  <description>  &lt;div data-history-node-id="1017100" class="layout layout--onecol"&gt;
    &lt;div class="layout__region layout__region--content"&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-field-node-image field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;img src="https://www.linuxjournal.com/sites/default/files/nodeimage/story/national_linux_0.jpg" width="308" height="377" alt="" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-author field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;by &lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/michael-reed" lang="" about="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/michael-reed" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="" xml:lang=""&gt;Michael Reed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;We've talked about the concept of national Linux distributions &lt;a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/case-national-linux-distributions"&gt;before&lt;/a&gt;, and the Russians are a nation that has engaged in previous attempts to standardize on Linux. Recently, Vladimir Putin, the Russian Prime Minister, made an announcement of a renewed effort towards open source adoption on a massive, despite the previous failures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Armchair pundits have had to make do with translated versions of the &lt;a href="http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;sl=auto&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http://filearchive.cnews.ru/doc/2010/06/17/2299p.doc&amp;prev=_t&amp;rurl=translate.google.com&amp;twu=1&amp;usg=ALkJrhhME1kNxnyz7MdPFjr5dioTfz3Udg"&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; and of the &lt;a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=2&amp;eotf=1&amp;sl=ru&amp;tl=en&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fopen.cnews.ru%2Fnews%2Ftop%2Findex.shtml%3F2010%2F12%2F27%2F421556"&gt;announcement&lt;/a&gt;, but what seems clear is that under the new plan Russian institutions will undergo a transition to open source software between 2011 and 2015. For example, the translated document specifies that in the fourth quarter of 2011, federal institutions will engage in:&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Formation of the base package of free software solutions for typical problems of the federal executive bodies with the needs of the federal bodies of executive power in the types of software.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Followed by, in the second quarter of 2012:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Creating and maintaining a single repository of free software used in the federal bodies of executive power.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The whole 25 point plan runs along these lines, and it's detailed and well thought out. In fact, this focused plan of action reveals two truths about the Russian governmental attitude towards open source software:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Firstly, despite failures in the past, the powers in charge are determined to go through with adopting Linux and open source. This shows just how much value they attach to FOSS adoption. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondly, the documentation shows that Russian policy makers have learned, the hard way, that an uncoordinated and vague initiative is unlikely to succeed. As I mentioned in my earlier article, any initiative to move over to Linux is typically doomed if it is not part of a coordinated strategy. For example, I would argue that a plan to move all schools over to Open Office as the de facto office suite would have more chance of success than a plan to move one part of the school system entirely over to Linux and open source.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The dissemination of the announcement on the forums has been mixed. The competence of governments to efficiently organize large projects of this nature is a theme that always rears its head in these discussions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-link field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;a href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/russian-linux-push-continues" hreflang="und"&gt;Go to Full Article&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      
    &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;

</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael Reed</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">1017100 at https://www.linuxjournal.com</guid>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
