<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/" xmlns:sioc="http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#" xmlns:sioct="http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/dumb-terminals">
  <channel>
    <title>dumb terminals</title>
    <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/dumb-terminals</link>
    <description/>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
  <title>Observation: Cloud computing is nothing new</title>
  <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/observation-cloud-computing-nothing-new</link>
  <description>  &lt;div data-history-node-id="1016110" class="layout layout--onecol"&gt;
    &lt;div class="layout__region layout__region--content"&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-field-node-image field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;img src="https://www.linuxjournal.com/sites/default/files/nodeimage/story/cloud_terminals.png" width="342" height="297" alt="" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-author field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;by &lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/michael-reed" lang="" about="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/michael-reed" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="" xml:lang=""&gt;Michael Reed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_computing"&gt;Cloud computing&lt;/a&gt; is not only the latest buzz term, it might well be the model of computing that powers the 21st century. However, it’s easy to forget that personal computing, in which each user has a standalone system that can operate without a network, is itself a relatively new approach.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first practical computers were enormous behemoths composed of clicking relays and vacuum tubes. Much of the early development of these multi-ton monsters had been spurred by the allied &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultra"&gt;code-breaking effort&lt;/a&gt; during World War II. For the first thirty years of the history of general purpose computers, computer time was the exclusive privilege of large institutions and governments. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the first breakthroughs in bringing down the cost of computer access was the concept of a time-sharing system. In such a system, multiple operators can access the resources of the computer through the use of remote terminals. Here, in the form of early Teletype terminals, and later, video terminals, we see the emergence of a network topology in which computing horsepower is located in a central computer, away from the user.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It was the era of the mainframe and the dumb-terminal. Typically, these  dumb terminals would lack storage or computation capability, as they  were simply a display with a keyboard. By the 1970s, an operator (usually wearing flared trousers, if the textbooks I’ve seen are accurate), would sit in front of an amber or green screened terminal, thankful that he no longer needed to wait in line in to hand in a box of carefully arranged punch-cards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fast forward to the late 70s and a new paradigm was beginning to gain favour. If you’ve seen the film &lt;a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0168122/"&gt;The Pirates of Silicon Valley&lt;/a&gt;, a dramatisation of the early years of Apple Computers, you may remember a scene in which the young Steve Wozniak is compelled to show his prototype personal computer to his employer, Hewlett Packard. In the scene that I’m talking about, Steve fears that his bosses will take his idea from him. The exchange goes something like this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HP exec&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Steve, it is Steve isn’t it?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Steve Wozniak&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;(nods)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;HP exec&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Steve, you say that this... gadget... of yours is for ordinary people. What on earth would ordinary people want with computers?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(long pause)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The idea that was being mooted was that of a personal computer, that is, a self-contained computer that only requires an electrical power supply in order to operate. Singular computers that did not need to be connected to a larger computer in order to run went on to become the popular face of computing for the remainder of the 20th century.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-link field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;a href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/observation-cloud-computing-nothing-new" hreflang="und"&gt;Go to Full Article&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      
    &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;

</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael Reed</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">1016110 at https://www.linuxjournal.com</guid>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
