<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:og="http://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="http://schema.org/" xmlns:sioc="http://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#" xmlns:sioct="http://rdfs.org/sioc/types#" xmlns:skos="http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/advocacy">
  <channel>
    <title>advocacy</title>
    <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/advocacy</link>
    <description/>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
  <title>German Open Source Experiment: Things Not Going To Plan</title>
  <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/german-open-source-experiment-things-not-going-plan</link>
  <description>  &lt;div data-history-node-id="1018453" class="layout layout--onecol"&gt;
    &lt;div class="layout__region layout__region--content"&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-field-node-image field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;img src="https://www.linuxjournal.com/sites/default/files/nodeimage/story/german_doc.png" width="564" height="480" alt="" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-author field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;by &lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/michael-reed" lang="" about="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/michael-reed" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="" xml:lang=""&gt;Michael Reed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Recently, the Foreign Office of Germany made the &lt;a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&amp;tl=en&amp;js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;layout=2&amp;eotf=1&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.netzpolitik.org%2F2011%2Finterne-dokumente-des-auswartigen-amtes-zur-anderung-der-open-source-strategie%2F&amp;act=url"&gt;announcement&lt;/a&gt; (translated news report) that it is migrating away from Linux back to Windows as its desktop solution. We've covered the concept of national adoption of Linux at a government level a &lt;a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/russian-linux-push-continues"&gt;couple&lt;/a&gt; of times &lt;a href="http://www.linuxjournal.com/content/case-national-linux-distributions"&gt;before&lt;/a&gt;, but this is one of the first cases of a government moving back the other way. The most important action that community can take at this point is ask, “why?”&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The German Foreign Office first moved over to Linux as a server platform in 2001. It then began using Linux and open source software in general on the desktop in 2005, and all laptops were moved to a Debian system. Making the regression even more frustrating, reports released in &lt;a href="http://www.opensourcejahrbuch.de/download/jb2007/osjb2007-03-06-werner.pdf"&gt;2007&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/AAmt-1-Organisationsuntersuchung.pdf"&gt;2009&lt;/a&gt; (both documents German) indicated that the adoption of FOSS, despite a few small problems, has been a success.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Making matters worse, the transition back to Windows XP, to be followed by Windows 7, includes dropping OpenOffice, Firefox and Thunderbird in favor of MS Office and Outlook. Yuk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This might a time to start asking some difficult questions. It was a prestige victory for FOSS and Linux on the desktop when the German Foreign Office first migrated, and getting a straight answer about what went wrong is now vitally important.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Actually getting to the answers isn't easy because the decisions weren't arrived at in a technical forum, but rather, in the murky world of politics. For English speakers such as myself, the fact that the available documentation is in German presents a further barrier. From what I've been able to glean, thanks to Google's translation facility, the problems that have been stated fall into three categories: hardware support, interoperability and training and user adoption. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hardware support problem is an old chestnut, and I think the only reasonable analysis of the situation must be a pragmatic one. Within an office, a certain percentage of hardware won't work as soon as it is plugged in. A smaller percentage of the total will never work at all. The report lists scanners and printers as an example. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-link field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;a href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/german-open-source-experiment-things-not-going-plan" hreflang="und"&gt;Go to Full Article&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      
    &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;

</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 15:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael Reed</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">1018453 at https://www.linuxjournal.com</guid>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
