<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="https://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:foaf="https://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:og="https://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:rdfs="https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="https://schema.org/" xmlns:sioc="https://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#" xmlns:sioct="https://rdfs.org/sioc/types#" xmlns:skos="https://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:xsd="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/gpt-2">
  <channel>
    <title>GPT-2</title>
    <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/gpt-2</link>
    <description/>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
  <title>An AI Wizard of Words</title>
  <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/ai-wizard-words</link>
  <description>  &lt;div data-history-node-id="1340681" class="layout layout--onecol"&gt;
    &lt;div class="layout__region layout__region--content"&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-field-node-image field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;img src="https://www.linuxjournal.com/sites/default/files/nodeimage/story/bigstock-Artificial-Intelligence-1745972.jpg" width="900" height="675" alt="AI" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-author field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;by &lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/marcel-gagn%C3%A9" lang="" about="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/marcel-gagn%C3%A9" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="" xml:lang=""&gt;Marcel Gagné&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;A look at using OpenAI's Generative Pretrained Transformer 2 (GPT-2) to generate text.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
It's probably fair to say that there's more than one person out there who is
worried about some version of artificial intelligence, or AI, possibly in a
robot body of some kind, taking people's jobs. Anything that is repetitive or
easily described is considered fair game for a robot, so driving a car or
working in a factory is fair game.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
Until recently, we could tell ourselves that people like yours truly—the
writers and those who create things using some form of creativity—were more
or less immune to the march of the machines. Then came GPT-2, which stands for
Generative Pretrained Transformer 2. I think you'll agree, that isn't the
sexiest name imaginable for a civilization-ending text bot. And since it's
version 2, I imagine that like &lt;em&gt;Star Trek&lt;/em&gt;'s M-5 computer, perhaps GPT-1 wasn't
entirely successful. That would be the original series episode titled, "The
Ultimate Computer", if you want to check it out.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
So what does the name "GPT-2" stand for? Well, "generative" means
pretty much what it sounds like. The program generates text based on a
predictive model, much like your phone suggests the next word as you type.
The "pretrained" part is also quite obvious in that the model released by
OpenAI has been built and fine-tuned for a specific purpose. The last word,
"Transformer", refers to the "transformer architecture", which is a neural network
design architecture suited for understanding language. If you want to dig
deeper into that last one, I've included a link from a Google AI blog that
compares it to other machine learning architecture (see Resources).
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
On February 14, 2019, Valentine's Day, OpenAI released GPT-2 with a
warning:
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Our model, called GPT-2 (a successor to GPT), was trained simply to predict
the next word in 40GB of Internet text. Due to our concerns about malicious
applications of the technology, we are not releasing the trained model. As an
experiment in responsible disclosure, we are instead releasing a much smaller
model for researchers to experiment with, as well as a technical paper.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
I've included a link to the blog in the Resources section at the end of this
article. It's worth
reading partly because it demonstrates a sample of what this software is
capable of using the full model (see Figure 1 for a sample). We already have
a problem with human-generated fake news; imagine a tireless machine capable
of churning out vast quantities of news and posting it all over the internet, and you start to get a feel for the dangers. For that reason, OpenAI released
a much smaller model to demonstrate its capabilities and to engage
researchers and developers.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-link field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;a href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/ai-wizard-words" hreflang="en"&gt;Go to Full Article&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      
    &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;

</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marcel Gagné</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">1340681 at https://www.linuxjournal.com</guid>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
