<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="https://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="https://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:foaf="https://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:og="https://ogp.me/ns#" xmlns:rdfs="https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#" xmlns:schema="https://schema.org/" xmlns:sioc="https://rdfs.org/sioc/ns#" xmlns:sioct="https://rdfs.org/sioc/types#" xmlns:skos="https://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#" xmlns:xsd="https://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#" version="2.0" xml:base="https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/reactos">
  <channel>
    <title>ReactOS</title>
    <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/tag/reactos</link>
    <description/>
    <language>en</language>
    
    <item>
  <title>Non-Linux FOSS: Open-Source Windows?</title>
  <link>https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/non-linux-foss-open-source-windows</link>
  <description>  &lt;div data-history-node-id="1338929" class="layout layout--onecol"&gt;
    &lt;div class="layout__region layout__region--content"&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-field-node-image field--type-image field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;img src="https://www.linuxjournal.com/sites/default/files/nodeimage/story/11953fossf1.jpg" width="200" height="151" alt="" typeof="foaf:Image" class="img-responsive" /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-author field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;by &lt;a title="View user profile." href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/shawn-powers" lang="" about="https://www.linuxjournal.com/users/shawn-powers" typeof="schema:Person" property="schema:name" datatype="" xml:lang=""&gt;Shawn Powers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-body field--type-text-with-summary field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;&lt;p&gt;
I have mixed emotions about ReactOS. It's open source. It's freely
available. But, its goal is to be binary-compatible with Windows! ReactOS
is not a Linux operating system. In fact, it doesn't share the UNIX
architecture at all. It looks like Windows NT, and it behaves much like
Windows NT.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
It's just odd!
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;
The best way I can think to describe it is to imagine if Wine evolved
into an entire operating system that booted on hardware instead of
running inside Linux. That's basically what ReactOS feels like. It's
not ready for prime time (and the developers make that very clear—it's alpha software), but it's worth checking out. Since it's early in
the development process, if you get involved now, you can have a say in
what compatibilities get priority.
&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;img src="https://www.linuxjournal.com/files/linuxjournal.com/ufiles/imagecache/large-550px-centered/u1002061/11953fossf1.png" alt="" title="" class="imagecache-large-550px-centered" /&gt;&lt;p&gt;
ReactOS is the perfect solution for folks who need to run Windows apps,
but absolutely refuse to run Microsoft code. I'm personally not convinced
that ReactOS is a better idea than Wine running inside Linux, but I'm sure
running it as its own operating system will provide possibilities that
just can't happen in a Wine environment. The folks at ReactOS provide
installers and prebuilt VM instances that can be launched in order
to try it out on your existing system. Whether you are just morbidly
curious about a non-Windows Windows or are interested in getting
involved in the development, go to &lt;a href="https://reactos.org"&gt;https://reactos.org&lt;/a&gt; for
more details.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
      
            &lt;div class="field field--name-node-link field--type-ds field--label-hidden field--item"&gt;  &lt;a href="https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/non-linux-foss-open-source-windows" hreflang="und"&gt;Go to Full Article&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
      
    &lt;/div&gt;
  &lt;/div&gt;

</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 20:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shawn Powers</dc:creator>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">1338929 at https://www.linuxjournal.com</guid>
    </item>

  </channel>
</rss>
